One of our customers is a large European natural gas distributor. Providing natural gas to millions of customers requires efficient systems to manage distribution, maintenance, and customer relations. Our customer determined that the best path forward to achieve efficiency is to build systems based on a business process management system that includes processes automated with integrated workflow software.
Workflow users whose applications make use principally of the Microsoft technology stack often consider open source Java workflow products at the same time they consider .NET-based FlowWright. There are 2 main reasons that most Microsoft users end up choosing FlowWright over free open source Java products.
Flowwright includes intuitive tools to help you manage triggers for workflow automation processes.
Developers build most applications using a common design pattern. That pattern can be object-based, object oriented, component-based, modular, etc...: some pattern exists. FlowWright helps developers through use of a layered approach where modules are separated into components, and components break down into objects using a full object oriented design.
FlowWright was built with two mandates: 1) "keep it intuitive" and 2) "do it your way". Most BPM/Workflow products require users to implement everything within their platform ecosystem. Users often learn the hard way that this restrictive approach makes it difficult to accomplish your goals successfully or efficiently. This blog explains why workflow without limitations is the best approach.
FlowWright provides users multiple options for reporting when conducting an audit. Just as paper-based data is susceptible to audit, so are digital data analytics. FlowWright tracks so much information starting at the design phase through run-time, that users then use this information to move the business forward.