<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=287945&amp;fmt=gif">

Issues To Avoid When Implementing Microservices

Microservices can involve implementation  pros and cons.  Microservices are becoming popular within organizations because there are several important advantages to implementing microservices.  Principally, according to this article, there are 2 primary drivers for implementing microservices:

Workflow processes that become Microservices

Microservices can be architected in many ways; most depend on a lot of custom code, or modules strung together that then provide Microservices.  FlowWright takes a different approach to designing Microservices with the users in mind. We share more below.

Service oriented processes

Service oriented architecture, also known as SOA, has been around for a while, but what about service oriented processes?  We currently have customers who are already implementing these types of processes using FlowWright's framework.

Micro-Services through FlowWright

FlowWright workflow-business process management platform offers several micro-services options for users to take advantage of.  Micro-services follow a clear separation of functionality that engages within the FlowWright user interface as follows:

Why component architecture fails in Micro-services

As many Enterprise organizations implement Micro-services, they either have non-working or satisfactory implementations of Micro services. This is a trend we have seen the last 2 years within our customer base.  What companies are truly looking for is a workflow solution to re-architect their Micro-services architecture/solution.